2026–27 programme admissions are openReview admissions

Office of Academic Administration

The structure
behind the study.

The registrar, faculty, academic board, and student services maintain the standards, records, decisions, and support that turn individual classes into a coherent academy.

Academic governance

Decisions have
named owners.

Authority is separated so no single instructor controls admission, assessment, discipline, and appeal in the same matter.

Academic Board

Approves programs, learning outcomes, assessment frameworks, major regulations, and annual academic priorities.

Faculty Council

Reviews syllabi, teaching practice, resources, moderation, and changes arising from student or faculty evidence.

Admissions Panel

Reviews applications against the published rubric and records reasons for each decision.

Assessment & Appeals Panel

Moderates grades and hears eligible appeals without the original decision-maker controlling the review.

Student Assembly

Elects representatives, raises cohort issues, and contributes documented feedback to quality review.

Quality cycle

Every offering leaves evidence.

  1. 01Design

    Outcomes, workload, sources, assessment, and accessibility are declared before publication.

  2. 02Approve

    A second academic reviewer checks coherence, scope, risks, and level.

  3. 03Deliver

    Attendance, changes, student questions, and teaching incidents are recorded.

  4. 04Moderate

    Selected assessment decisions receive a second-reader check.

  5. 05Review

    Completion, feedback, complaints, outcomes, and faculty reflection inform revisions.